Skip past navigation, straight to the content

Monthly Archives: April 2007

Interesting Facts about Cheese

  • Cheese, Seattle, Washington

    Round One, before the wine

I took a wine and cheese pairing class last night, and learned a few things I’ll pass on to my millions of readers:

  • All Cheese Rind is Edible: Even the wax and foil (!) ones. Cheese makers spend time crafting the rinds to add to the flavor. Not all of the rinds taste great, but they’re edible.
  • Brie, and other soft cheeses, have less fat than hard cheeses: This is obvious in hindsight, but it’s because hard cheeses have less moisture, and therefore a higher percentage of fat.
  • The mold in blue cheeses is a penicillium: This was interesting for me because I’m allergic to the antibiotic version of Penicillin — but I have no symptoms when eating blue cheese (or my current favorite, soft Italian gorgonzola).
  • Non-pasteurized cheeses are legal in the US as long as they’re more than 60 days old: The libertarian in me tries not to imagine how much federal legislation exists around cheese.
  • Lactose intolerance is typically cow-milk intolerance: Most people are just fine with goat or sheep’s milk, as the intolerance stands from some cow-specific enzymes.
  • Traditional mozzarella (mozzarella di bufala) is made from water buffalo milk: I thought it was just a name, but it’s not. Apparently, there are some big water buffalo farms in California.
  • Goats have the highest proportional milk production of any farm animal

They also handed out the following chart, which shows the composition of various milks, by percent weight (the totals don’t add to 100 because I removed the Minerals column, do the math yourself if you’re curious):

Milk Type Fat Protein Lactose Water
Human 4.0 1.1 6.8 88
Cow 3.7 3.4 4.8 87
Cow: Holstein/Friesian 3.6 3.4 4.9 87
Cow: Brown Swiss 4.0 3.6 4.7 87
Cow: Jersey 5.2 3.9 4.9 85
Cow: Zebu 4.7 3.3 4.9 86
Water Buffalo 6.9 3.8 5.1 83
Yak 6.5 5.8 4.6 82
Goat 4.0 3.4 4.5 88
Sheep 7.5 6.0 4.8 80
Camel 2.9 3.9 5.4 87
Reindeer 17 11 2.8 68
Horse 1.2 2.0 6.3 90
Fin Whale 42 12 1.3 43

I’ve had Cow, Water Buffalo, Yak, Goat, and Sheep’s milk. I’m definitely curious about Reindeer and Fin Whale (how do they milk it?).

Block Elements

Unlike Inline elements, Block elements take up the entire width of the text column and have line breaks before and after their content. By far, the most common block element is Paragraph.

Here are the elements that shipped with WPF that derive from Block:

  • Paragraph: With a straightforward name, this element (along with TextBlock) is the only container for Inline elements.
  • Section: A container for other Block elements — analogous to Span, which contains Inline elements.
  • BlockUIContainer: A container for UIElement-derived classes to be displayed as a block. Analogous to InlineUIElement.
  • List: Creates an ordered or unordered list. Contains ListItem elements.
  • Table: Contains TableRowGroup
  • elements.

Additionally, there are a few helper classes that are a bit block-ish:

  • ListItem: Block container for use within a List.
  • TableRowGroup: Container for TableRow objects.
  • TableRow: Container for TableCell objects.
  • TableCell: Block container for use within a TableRow.

Just like the inline elements, all of these elements do not derive from UIElement or Visual — this is because they do not have a one-to-one mapping between their content and visuals on screen. The reasons for this, and their ramifications, will have to wait for the next post.

Differences from HTML

  • No nested paragraphs: It’s worth re-iterating, because you’ll probably run into it some time.
  • Strict structure for Lists and Tables: WPF is strict about the structure of Lists and, in particular, Tables. This leads to verbose markup.
  • Only one List: Unlike HTML, there are no specialized elements for ordered and unordered list. You use the MarkerStyle property.

Commuting, Happiness, and Seattle

This week’s New Yorker has an interesting article by Nick Paumgarten, There and Back Again, which really resonated with me. Here’s a relevant quote:

Three years ago, two economists at the University of Zurich, Bruno Frey and Alois Stutzer, released a study called “Stress That Doesn’t Pay: The Commuting Paradox.” They found that, if your trip is an hour each way, you’d have to make forty per cent more in salary to be as “satisfied” with life as a noncommuter is … The commuting paradox reflects the notion that many people, who are supposedly rational (according to classical economic theory, at least), commute even though it makes them miserable. They are not, in the final accounting, adequately compensated.

“People with long journeys to and from work are systematically worse off and report significantly lower subjective well-being,” Stutzer told me. According to the economic concept of equilibrium, people will move or change jobs to make up for imbalances in compensation. Commute time should be offset by higher pay or lower living costs, or a better standard of living. It is this last category that people apparently have trouble measuring. They tend to overvalue the material fruits of their commute—money, house, prestige—and to undervalue what they’re giving up: sleep, exercise, fun.

I was spoiled by growing up in a small town — I found my daily commute from downtown Seattle to Redmond to be dreadful. It’s a little under 15 miles, but a one-way journey can take anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour and a half at peak hours (the median is about 45 minutes, but travel times are unpredictable). Honestly, this was a big reason I ended up leaving Microsoft.

The article brings up an interesting way to decide where to live:

Putnam likes to imagine that there is a triangle, its points comprising where you sleep, where you work, and where you shop. In a canonical English village, or in a university town, the sides of that triangle are very short: a five-minute walk from one point to the next. In many American cities, you can spend an hour or two travelling each side. “You live in Pasadena, work in North Hollywood, shop in the Valley,” Putnam said. “Where is your community?” The smaller the triangle, the happier the human, as long as there is social interaction to be had. In that kind of life, you have a small refrigerator, because you can get to the store quickly and often. By this logic, the bigger the refrigerator, the lonelier the soul.

I would add another important location: where you see your friends.

I sold my car just before leaving for China last year, and I’ve stayed car-free since. Seattle isn’t an English village, but the points of my triangle/rectangle are all within walking distance of where I live — and I love it that way.

Come See Me at Mix

Those attending Mix 07 next week in Las Vegas might be interested in going to Beyond the Reader: Improving the Online Media Experience, a panel discussion featuring yours truly (along with Roger Black of The Font Bureau/Danilo Black and Tom Bodkin of the New York Times). It’s currently scheduled during the first timeslot on Wednesday morning.

Here’s the abstract:

Is it really possible to make online narrative content glamorous? Smart designers are complementing their traditional strengths in branding and narrative with technologies such as WPF to create highly flexible, readable and vibrant online media products. See how designer-delivered digital media can work on-and-off-line, in-and-outside the browser. Envision next year’s portal digital world and how can you become part of it. For producers of newspapers, magazines, and TV content, this is the next Web.